Collaborative learningFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Collaborative learning is a situation in which two or more people learn or attempt to learn something together.[1] Unlike individual learning, people engaged in collaborative learning capitalize on one another’s resources and skills (asking one another for information, evaluating one another’s ideas, monitoring one another’s work, etc.).[2][3] More specifically, collaborative learning is based on the model that knowledge can be created within a population where members actively interact by sharing experiences and take on asymmetry roles.[4] Put differently, collaborative learning refers to methodologies and environments in which learners engage in a common task where each individual depends on and is accountable to each other. Often, collaborative learning is used as an umbrella term for a variety of approaches in education that involve joint intellectual effort by students or students and teachers.[9] Thus, collaborative learning is commonly illustrated when groups of students work together to search for understanding, meaning, or solutions or to create an artifact or product of their learning. Further, collaborative learning redefines traditional student-teacher relationship in the classroom which results in controversy over whether this paradigm is more beneficial than harmful.[10][11] Collaborative learning activities can include collaborative writing, group projects, joint problem solving, debates, study teams, and other activities. The approach is closely related to cooperative learning.

my ict project proposa

Collaborative learning in Internet

fofofkl= fyda lSm fofkl= tlg tl;= ù wka;¾ cd,h Ndú;d lr bf.kqï b.ekaùï l%shdj,shg b; M,odhs f,i iïnkaO úh yel' th Collaborative learning in Internet f,i yeoskafõ' fufia wka;¾d,h yryd ikaksfõokh yd f;dr;=re yqjudre lr .ekSu úúO wdldrhg l< yel' tajd kï" 1' wl=re 3' rEm 5' p,k rEm 2' o;a; 4' Yío 6' ùäfhda mg tksid wka;¾cd,h yryd fufia f;dr;=re yqjudre lr .ksñka bf.kqï b.ekaùï l%shdj,sh Ndú;d lsrSu ksid úYajh f.da,shlrKhùu;a tu.ska úYaj .ïudk hk ixl,amh ìysùu;a isÿfõ' bf.kqï b.ekaùï l%shdj,sfhaoS wka;¾cd,h Tiafia woyia yqjudre lr .ekSu i|yd úúO l%u Ndú;d l< yel' Wod( 1. email 3. foram 2. blogs 4. skype email - úoaHq;a ;emE, wka;¾cd,h uÕska mqoa.,hka fofofkla w;r ÿr mqÿudldr f,i ióm lr we;' úoaHq;a ;emE, (Electronic mail- email) l%uh uÕska jeä wdhdihlska fyda fjfyilska f;drj wvq úhoulska tfiau b;d blaukska ;udf.a f;dr;=re ;u ys;j;dg Tyq isák ia:dkh ms

B.Ed ICT

Guided discovery learning is a constructivist instructional design model that combines principles from discovery learning and sometimes radical constructivism with principles from cognitivist instructional design theory. “ Students discover knowledge without guidance, developing their own understanding. The role of instruction is merely to provide a suitable environment, which in software might be a microworld or simulation. Discovery learning, or instructionless learning, involves hypothesis formulation and testing The problem de Jong and van Joolingen (1998) include the following problems that learners encounter in scientific discovery learning: Generating hypotheses is difficult. For example, learners may not know what a hypothesis should look like. They have difficulty in modifying their hypotheses to afford the data they gather. Or they make inferences based on variables that remain unchanged between two experiments. Designing experiments for deciding on the validity of a hypothesis is also a major challenge. For example, learners have a certain tendency to seek information confirming their hypothesis instead of trying to falsify their hypothesis. Or they design experiments which vary too many variables at once so that no conclusion can be drawn. Self-regulation of the discovery learning process is a key issue which separates successful learners from unsuccessful learners. Successful discoverers tend to follow a plan going through their experiments, where unsuccessful learners use a more random strategy. Guided Discovery, is characterized by convergent thinking. The instructor devises a series of statements or questions that guide the learner, step by logical step, making a series of discoveries that leads to a single predetermined goal. In other words the instructor initiates a stimulus and the learner reacts by engaging in active inquiry thereby discovering the appropriate response. Mosston (1972:117) specifies ten cognitive operations that might take place as the learner engages in active inquiry: recognizing da analysing, synthesizing, comparing and contrasting, drawing conclusions, hypothesizing memorizing, inquiring, inventing, and discovering. By actively doing and consequence discovering facts or concepts, the learner will understand and therefore remember the subject matter. Mosston (1972:122) cautions that "discovery learning cannot take place if t answers are given." He also points out certain drawbacks of this teaching method: it precisely controls and manipulates learning behaviour and could therefore be abused, and is designed for individual rather than group use Guided discovery learning designs can be enhanced with various computational tools. One of these is simulation. According to Reichert's (2005) summary of de Jong and Joolingen (1998) the following scaffolds should be included in the design of computer simulations for discovery learning.

NIE BED pedagogy III

BED.ICT pedagogy II subject
3rd year
pedagogy subject of the BED ICT degree was started on 18 th may 2013